Icetruck.tv News Blog

TV

TV

‘Narcos’ Boss on Cast Reset, Move to Mexico for Season 4

michael_pena_diego_luna_and_eric_newman_-_inset_-_getty_-_h_2017

'Narcos' Boss on Cast Reset, Move to Mexico for Season 4

New 'Narcos' stars Michael Pena and Diego Luna; Inset: Showrunner Eric Newman

In this story

Netflix
Netflix
Narcos
Narcos

Netflix's drug cartel series is shifting away from leading man Pedro Pascal. "The continuing character on 'Narcos' was always intended to be cocaine," showrunner Eric Newman exclusively tells THR.

Narcos will be going back in time to explore the origins of its next threat in the drug war: Mexico's Guadalajara cartel.

The Netflix drug cartel series has added two new stars for its fourth season, Michael Pena and Diego Luna, and will be set in Mexico City to explore the rise of the Guadalajara cartel, the first Mexican drug trafficking group to sync up with the Colombia bosses in the cocaine trade. Though Pena and Luna's roles have not yet been revealed, the move to Mexico signals the end of main character Javier Pena's story — and a phasing out for Narcos leading man Pedro Pascal.

Up until now, the series has been shot entirely in Colombia to track the original cocaine king, Pablo Escobar (played by Wagner Moura), and the successors to his Medellin cartel, Cali. The four Cali cartel bosses were the villains in season three and their deaths and incarcerations brought the Narcos timeline up to the mid-1990s.

"The origins of the Guadalajara cartel are in the late 1970s and early 1980s, so Narcos is going back in time," showrunner Eric Newman told The Hollywood Reporter about the season four announcement, made on Tuesday. Netflix released a video of the new theme song (below) along with the casting and location news; the season launches in 2018.

This is not the first cast reset for Narcos. Star Boyd Holbrook exited the series after two seasons when the real-life timeline of his character, DEA agent Steve Murphy, caught up to the show's. The series then took liberty with his partner's story to keep Pascal in a starring role as DEA agent Pena for season three.

Narcos' move to Mexico was first reported in September when a location scout working on the fourth season, Carlos Munoz Portal, 37, was found dead in his car northeast of Mexico City in a high-crime area. According to local reports, his body and car were riddled with bullets. Though an investigation is still ongoing, Newman confirmed what THR had reported, that his death is not believed to be connected to the show according to local law enforcement.

Below, in an exclusive chat with THR, Newman goes inside the creative decision to shift Narcos to Mexico, including the safety precautions taken on set in light of the tragedy; compares the Guadalajara cartel (where Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman got his start) to season one and two’s Escobar story and his season three Cali successors; and discusses exiting star Pascal, along with the show's future.

Where are you in production on season four now?

We are already underway and have filmed the first two episodes. We’re about to start shooting episodes three and four. We’re shooting in and around Mexico City as well as a number of other cities around the country. Authenticity is so important to us, and for the same reason that we had to do the Medellin and Cali cartel stories in Colombia, we felt we had to do the story of the Guadalajara cartel in Mexico.

Carlos Munoz Portal was killed while scouting locations for season four. How did his death impact the set and production?

It was a terrible tragedy for all of us. There were obviously several ramifications. First, the emotional toll of losing a member of the team, particularly one as well-liked and respected as Carlos, weighs very heavy. We had just started preproduction when it happened and so it was a rude awakening and ominous beginning for the dozens of crew who had begun the process of relocating the show. It rattled a lot of people, frankly. We certainly had to pause a moment, mourn and then carefully consider whether or not we could proceed safely in Mexico. We commissioned numerous security analyses and met with Mexican law enforcement officials and government at the highest level, and concluded together that the crime had nothing to do with Carlos' work on the show. There was no specific threat to Narcos. And, in fact, it’s very likely that the people who killed Carlos had no idea who he was working for or what he was doing there. It was clearly a terrible instance of wrong place, wrong time. But it did force us to evaluate our process and our security protocol to ensure the maximum degree of safety for our cast and crew. The Mexican authorities assured us that we were a priority and that they very much wanted us to continue working there. They saw this as an isolated occurrence, and I think everybody involved was able to look at each other and say that we should proceed.

What can you say about the status of the investigation into his death?

It’s ongoing and I can’t really comment further on the specifics of it.

You are also in a new location since the series thus far has been shot in Colombia. What precautions did you take?

We increased our security. We’ve made every attempt to operate only in the areas that we know to be safe. We have an incredible team of security professionals made up of Israelis, Mexicans and Americans. We feel like we can protect our crew.

Does it feel different shooting in Mexico City? Have you received any threats?

No. Never. Not before, not after. There have obviously been individuals who have sought to gain some attention with their statements about the show. These individuals sought to take advantage of a tragedy to try to increase their own profile. I find it both irresponsible and shameful. Despite this, there has never been a threat, credible or otherwise, made toward the show, either in Colombia or in Mexico. The many Mexican members of our cast and crew have told us that they are not concerned about safety. Diego Luna is one of the most beloved actors in Mexico and our cast has a number of other high-profile Mexican actors and no one has expressed concern.

At what point did you know you were taking the series to Mexico?

We always knew that we would get to Mexico eventually. A key team comprised of myself and the guys I really trust and work very closely with — [director] Andi Baiz, [co-creators] Carlo Bernard and Doug Miro — have been discussing how to best transition to Mexico as early as season two. We decided on the Guadalajara cartel because it represents the beginning of the modern Mexican drug trade. It makes sense to start there.

When did you know that you would retire DEA agent Javier Pena from the story, and with that decision, that Pedro Pascal would no longer be the star of the show?

It was a part of the plan as early as season two. The design was always to finish out the Colombian story and the players that we’ve come to know there, and then start anew in Mexico.

So, Pascal was aware of the plan and kept it a secret?

Yes. Although, he alternated between asking us to kill off his character at one point and then wondering, "Hey, maybe he can come back." I’d like to think that he still hasn’t made up his mind about whether he wants to come back. (Laughs.) It is after all an intersecting universe — the Mexicans did a lot of business with the Colombians.

Are you confirming, then, that he won’t appear at all in the upcoming season?

I’m confirming that it’s not about him.

The season three finale was somewhat open-ended with Javier Pena, where it wasn’t entirely clear if he wanted to go fight another drug war in Mexico after Cali. How should we interpret that final scene now?

We think more about the place than the people. Clearly, we suggest Mexico at the end of season three. The Guadalajara cartel was a force in the 1980s, concurrent with the Colombian cartels. So we will ostensibly be going back in time a little bit. The Mexican cartels started with marijuana and heroin and then got into cocaine, which they acquired from the Colombians. We see a little bit of that in season three with the character of Amado Carrillo Fuentes (aka Lord of the Skies) and his Juarez cartel. But reports that we would focus on Juarez in season four were inaccurate.

What does Narcos look like without Pascal and how do you describe what the series has become, with new stars and a new story being taken on each season?

The continuing character on the show was always intended to be cocaine and the futile war against it. Our characters are important, and there are a lot of similarities where, as we like to say, there are bad guys and very bad guys, but they are secondary to the cocaine. It’s about the ongoing war against drugs and against cocaine and the inherent, unwinnable nature of that conflict.

Why are Michael Pena and Diego Luna the right men for the job in season four?

First and foremost, they are both amazing actors. Michael is Mexican-American and Diego is Mexican, and that was very important for authenticity. They both responded to this particular story and they love the show. It’s not as short of a list as you think, but for us, the two of them were at the very top of it. We were thrilled to have them join us.

Will there be any recognizable faces?

It’s almost an entirely new group with some overlap and hopefully a few surprises.

How do the Mexican kings of cocaine compare to Pablo Escobar and Cali's reign in Colombia? What can be expected?

Everything about Mexican trafficking is closer to home. The proximity, the complexity of the relationship between the two countries. Colombia is a sort of remote place to most Americans, who have never been to Colombia or met a Colombian. It was easier to distance ourself from who we thought were the enemy. Mexico is our neighbor and so the ties are deeper.

You previously said the next chapter will require more of a looking inward into not only the supply but also the demand. Will you be tackling the U.S. role in the drug war?

It’s always a factor, given that we’re interacting directly across this border. The implication that this is not just about people sending us drugs that we don’t want is very much a part of Narcos.

How many seasons do you envision Narcos going?

I know we’d like to do more than four seasons and I know that we have the material. With history as a guide, we could go forever. Our M.O. is that we work very closely with people to whom these things happen, particularly on the law enforcement and DEA side.

This season, you are blowing up the series' chronological timeline so you can properly tell the Guadalajara cartel story. Is the longevity of the series now just a matter of how long it takes you to catch up to the present?

Yes. Even if we were to race through the story, it would still take a while to get to the present with the wealth of material that exists. We started the Colombian story in the late 1970s with Escobar. The Mexican cartel’s relationship with cocaine starts in the early 1980s — and what’s unique about the Guadalajara cartel is what they did organizationally. They really unified a large part of the trafficking world under one banner. They started it all and waited for the Colombians to fall before taking over the trafficking business. The frontline of the drug war is with the end users in the United States who continue to use and buy drugs, but we never seem to grasp that. Mexico is where we’ve chosen to fight it.

Netflix Narcos
Read the full article – Hollywoodreporter.com

TV

T.J. Miller Denies Claims of Sexual Assault and Violence

gettyimages-509210978-h_2016

T.J. Miller Denies Claims of Sexual Assault and Violence

T.J. Miller

The former 'Silicon Valley' star claims that an anonymous woman is "using the current climate to bandwagon and launch these false accusations."

Hours after T.J. Miller was accused of sexual assault and violence by an anonymous woman in a Daily Beast story, the comedian and actor is denying the allegations.

In the piece, the woman alleges that Miller hit and sexually assaulted her while the two were seeing each other in college at George Washington University in 2001. According to the story, she claims the former Silicon Valley star strangled her and punched her in the mouth during sex — and that he also penetrated her anally without her consent, and then later did so with a beer bottle.

Miller, who departed the hit HBO comedy in which he rose to fame abruptly last season, has several films coming up, including Steven Spielberg's Ready Player One and Ryan Reynold's Deadpool 2. The latter's studio Warner Bros. had no comment on the allegations, while Ready Player One producer20th Century Fox declined to comment on the matter.

While the movie studios have remained silent, HBO, where Miller's spent four seasons on Silicon Valley and also taped his recent standup special Meticulously Ridiculous, did offer a response. “There were no reports of sexual misconduct during T.J. Miller’s time working at HBO,” the cable network said in a statement to The Hollywood Reporter. “We have no plans to remove T.J. Miller’s projects from the network or streaming platforms.”

Miller took to Instagram to address the allegation, offering up the same statement from he and his wife, Kate, that he gave to the Daily Beast. Here it is in full:

We met this woman over a decade ago while studying together in college, she attempted to break us up back then by plotting for over a year before making contradictory claims and accusations. She attempted to discredit both of our voices and use us against one another by trying to portray Kate to be a continuous abuse victim of T.J. (further efforts to hurt the two of us). She was asked to leave our university comedy group because of worrisome and disturbing behavior, which angered her immensely, she then became fixated on our relationship, and began telling people around campus “I’m going to destroy them” & “I’m going to ruin him.” We are confident that a full consideration of accounts from and since that time will shed light and clarity on the true nature of not only this person’s character, but also on the real facts of the matter. (See the e-mails referenced). We stand together in stating this is nothing more than an unfortunate resurgence of her lies designed to wreak havoc on two happily married people in the public eye.

She began again to circulate rumors online once our relationship became public.

Sadly she is now using the current climate to bandwagon and launch these false accusations again. It is unfortunate that she is choosing this route as it undermines the important movement to make women feel safe coming forward about legitimate claims against real known predators.

We stand together and will not allow this person to take advantage of a serious movement toward gender equality by allowing her to use this moment to muddy the water with an unrelated personal agenda. We feel we all have an obligation now more than ever to prevent people from using reporters to spin lies into headlines, and focus instead on what is real.

We both champion and continue to stand up for people everywhere who have truly suffered injustice seeking to have justice brought into their lives.

Kate & T.J. Miller’s statement: We met this woman over a decade ago while studying together in college, she attempted to break us up back then by plotting for over a year before making contradictory claims and accusations. She attempted to discredit both of our voices and use us against one another by trying to portray Kate to be a continuous abuse victim of T.J. (further efforts to hurt the two of us). She was asked to leave our university comedy group because of worrisome and disturbing behavior, which angered her immensely, she then became fixated on our relationship, and began telling people around campus “I’m going to destroy them” & “I’m going to ruin him.” We are confident that a full consideration of accounts from and since that time will shed light and clarity on the true nature of not only this person’s character, but also on the real facts of the matter. (See the e-mails referenced). We stand together in stating this is nothing more than an unfortunate resurgence of her lies designed to wreak havoc on two happily married people in the public eye. She began again to circulate rumors online once our relationship became public. Sadly she is now using the current climate to bandwagon and launch these false accusations again. It is unfortunate that she is choosing this route as it undermines the important movement to make women feel safe coming forward about legitimate claims against real known predators. We stand together and will not allow this person to take advantage of a serious movement toward gender equality by allowing her to use this moment to muddy the water with an unrelated personal agenda. We feel we all have an obligation now more than ever to prevent people from using reporters to spin lies into headlines, and focus instead on what is real. We both champion and continue to stand up for people everywhere who have truly suffered injustice seeking to have justice brought into their lives. – Kate & T.J. Miller

A post shared by T.J. Miller (@teenagemillionaire) on


Read the full article – Hollywoodreporter.com

TV

‘Van Helsing’ Renewed for Season 3 at Syfy

nup_178434_0073_copy_-_h_2017

'Van Helsing' Renewed for Season 3 at Syfy

Season two wraps Jan. 4, with production resuming again in February.

Syfy is bringing back Van Helsing.

The NBCUniversal-owned cable network has picked up the Canadian import for a third season ahead of its sophomore finale Jan. 4. Production will resume in February for the third season.

The drama hails from Nomadic Pictures and is based on the feature film of the same name. Neil LaBute serves as showrunner on the drama, which also counts Dave Brown, Zadoc Angello of Echo Lake Entertainment and Daniel March of Dynamic Television as producers. The latter company handles worldwide distribution of the series outside of the U.S. and Canada.

"I couldn’t be happier to learn that Syfy has renewed Van Helsing for a season three — it has been a wonderful journey thus far, but we have much more of the Van Helsing saga to tell before we’re through,” LaBute said. “It’s great to be working with Syfy on this project again, along with Chad and Mike at Nomadic and all the others at Dynamic and Echo Lake as well. The writing team has some amazing adventures planned for our cast and a few new surprises as well — expect blood to be spilled and characters to die screaming while the fate of humanity slips closer and closer to the edge of true chaos and utter darkness.”

The 13-episode drama stars Kelly Overton, Missy Peregrym, Jonathan Scarfe, Christopher Heyerdahl, Vincent Gale, Rukiya Bernard, Trezzo Mahoro, Aleks Paunovic and Paul Johansson.

The series is part of a Syfy slate of originals that includes The Magicians, Happy, Krypton, The Purge, Nightflyers and fellow acquisition Wynonna Earp, among others.

Syfy
Read the full article – Hollywoodreporter.com

TV

‘Homeland’ Adds James D’Arcy for Season 7

gettyimages-818579730-h_2017

'Homeland' Adds James D'Arcy for Season 7

In this story

Homeland
Homeland
Showtime
Showtime

The Showtime drama recently announced a Feb. 11 return.

Homeland is beefing up its roster. Still in production on season seven, with at least one notable vacancy to fill, the Showtime drama has cast actor James D'Arcy for a recurring part.

The actor is set to play Anson, an arrogant former special ops agent to who went to The Farm (the CIA's Camp Peary) with Carrie (Claire Danes).

D'Arcy's formal addition comes just a few days after Showtime released the first trailer for the new season of Homeland, one that again finds Carrie and Saul (Mandy Patinkin) at odds — with her working to expose presidential corruption and him taking a job in the Oval Office. (The series is currently in production in Richmond, Virginia.)

The actor, most recently seen in Christopher Nolan's WWII drama Dunkirk, has had prominent TV roles on Broadchurch and Agent Carter. He’s repped by WME, Management 360, and Markham Froggat & Irwin in the U.K.

Homeland returns Sunday, Feb. 11.

Homeland Showtime
Read the full article – Hollywoodreporter.com

TV

‘Game of Thrones’ Star on the Final Season: “It’s Going to Hit Hard”

got

'Game of Thrones' Star on the Final Season: "It's Going to Hit Hard"

Isaac Hempstead Wright speaks with THR about season seven critiques and the show's currently filming final season.

[Warning: This story contains spoilers through season seven of HBO's Game of Thrones.]

Winter is coming, and so is the end.

The final six episodes of HBO's Game of Thrones are currently in production and are not expected to arrive until 2019. For many, the wait for new episodes is an agonizing experience, with so many questions still hanging in the balance and so much uncertainty in the air, as the White Walkers march through the Wall and toward Winterfell — their full impact still more than a year away from making itself known.

For those viewers, it's worth heeding some words of wisdom from Isaac Hempstead Wright, the young actor who plays the green-seeing Bran Stark: "When it comes to a conclusion, this is the end. Nothing more is coming, and the certainty of it being over will definitely bother people."

Hempstead Wright and the rest of the Game of Thrones cast are in the thick of filming the shortened final season of the series, one that star Sophie Turner promises will leave fans with bittersweet memories of the years spent in Westeros. For his part, Hempstead Wright echoes those sentiments, noting that he and his fellow cast and crew members are taking time now to savor each and every moment before Game of Thrones reaches the finish line — something he anticipates won't be fully appreciated until after the credits roll on the final episode.

Here's what the longtime Game of Thrones star revealed to The Hollywood Reporter about the emotionality of the final season, his anticipation of the fan reaction, his thoughts on some of the critiques leveled at season seven's penultimate episode and more.

You're in the midst of filming the final season of Game of Thrones, but while you were shooting season seven, did it already feel like you were in the home stretch?

Definitely. I think the fact that we were only doing seven episodes, in terms of the actual content and how far we were able to get the story to progress in that season, made us think: "This is definitely only part one." By the end of it, we were nowhere near resolution, but we're definitely on the downward descent into what this conclusion must be. I think the fact that these characters are all so much closer together now really added to the feeling that we were at the beginning of the finale.

Season seven featured only seven episodes, as opposed to the standard 10. The final season will be even shorter. What do you think is the benefit of these shorter seasons?

It's so critical that they didn't decide to just stretch this out for another ten episodes to make more money from it. The people making Game of Thrones are acutely aware of how they want this story to go. It's not like they don't have a big plan and need to bide their time with a few extra episodes. They know exactly how they want this to end. I think even from season five, they knew where the story was going. Therefore, we were able to really concentrate on the storyline far more than we had in previous seasons. In previous seasons, there were so many different organs in this living, breathing thing that is Game of Thrones that are existing all over the place, and season seven meant we could get rid of the deadwood in the story — not that there is any deadwood in the story, but we could focus on what was important now in telling the ending. After season seven, clearly Littlefinger [Aidan Gillen] isn't going to be in the story anymore, and this storyline here has been concluded…but there's also the fact that we spent just as much time and just as much money on fewer episodes. Naturally, we were able to give far more attention. I think it ends up being more fast-paced. When you're heading into a finale, you don't want to have any unnecessary episodes. You want to be going, "God, we didn't have enough episodes! I want to know where it's going next!"

The penultimate episode of season seven took some heat in terms of the practicalities of travel — the speed with which ravens and dragons could fly between Dragonstone and the realm beyond the Wall, for instance. Game of Thrones is the biggest show on TV at the moment. Do you think those kinds of criticisms were fair, or do you think they're overblown due to the show's popularity?

Naturally, when anything is coming toward its finale, especially something as consistently brilliant as Game of Thrones, naturally people are concerned about whether we can do this justice: "Are they going to fuck this up at the last minute?" Obviously, people will hold us to a higher standard: "That didn't make sense!" Definitely more than other seasons. We step up so much now that it's easier to find something that contradicts what was done earlier, seven seasons in. It's fair enough that people are very antsy and concentrated on us making season seven absolutely perfect. Perhaps some things get read into too much. I find people getting obsessed with some little details that aren't really relevant at all. I suppose Game of Thrones is its own worst enemy, then, because there are moments where these tiny details reveal so much about the plot and the future. But in general, I don't think there were any glaring plot holes. I think it was a pretty incredible season.

Is there a freedom to knowing that no matter what, even if you find the ending of this series satisfying, there will be some people who are inevitably disappointed — that an element of displeasure is simply unavoidable, given the size of the fan base?

We're all so confident in the way this story goes and the message it gives and how the whole story arc works. Season seven was a marvel in terms of epic, fast-paced, exciting storytelling. As long as we can reconcile with ourselves that we're happy with how it ends, it won't matter what anyone else thinks, really. As long as we feel we've done the story justice, and have done justice to George's universe and David and Dan's vision, then that's really all we can hope for. It won't go the way some people want. It will be too happy for some people, or too sad, or too whatever. That's the nature of an ending. Midway through a season, there's always the idea that this is going to continue and somewhere along the way we'll make up for it all. When it comes to a conclusion, this is the end. Nothing more is coming, and the certainty of it being over will definitely bother people. But overall, I think we're going to smash it. (Laughs)

Bran has become the Three-Eyed Raven, with the power to trip through the past. Have you felt a kinship with his abilities, the further along you have progressed with Game of Thrones? For instance, you began this show at Winterfell alongside Maisie Williams and Sophie Turner — and through season seven, at least, you're back to where it all started.

Definitely. And especially because I was aware of how the Three-Eyed Raven operates, I've really tried to be conscious of that nostalgia whenever I had a scene in Winterfell and by the godswood. I'll be very present in that scene, but midway through, all the other things that have happened here that have involved my character — even the things that haven't involved my character but were significant parts of the story unfolding in Winterfell's courtyard, like Ned Stark cleaning his sword, or when Maester Luwin is killed, or Ramsay's tyrannical reign over Winterfell. I was very acutely aware of what an important place it was to be back here, not just for my character, but the whole story. Winterfell has been such an important center of things. It was very fun to get back to that set — but it is a very cold and muddy set, and our holding area between takes is typically under a shipping container or a tent, so I wasn't thrilled on that front.

You were absent from the show during season five. Does that give you any insight into what it might feel like when Game of Thrones fully ends?

I still don't think I know what it's going to feel like, because that whole season, I knew I was going to be coming back. It was interesting to watch it unfold without knowing what was happening. That was bizarre. But that's not going to happen now that I've made it to season eight. It's not like I'll be dying on the show while it goes on for another three seasons, watching all my pals while I'm not there. It means that when we're done, we're done. I found it mildly reassuring that it was going on, even though I wasn't there. That whole world is still happening without me. It's sad I'm not a part of it, but oh well. When it actually finishes, it's going to hit hard. We won't experience it for a while, because we still have a lot of filming to do, and then there will be the whole whirlwind of the press, which will happen for a long time. I think it will be when we get to this time in 2019, when we're usually expecting the phone call organizing flights for the next season, that it will be very sad and it will be very real: This doesn't exist anymore. That's going to be an interesting transitional period. There will be so many glamorous [events] and all of these fireworks as we celebrate the ending of the show — and then all of the sudden, it will be nothing. And it will be sad.

What are your thoughts on the imminent ending of Game of Thrones? Let us know in the comments section, and keep following THR.com/GameOfThrones for full coverage of the fantasy series.

Game of Thrones
Read the full article – Hollywoodreporter.com

TV

TV Ratings: ‘Ellen’s Game of Games’ Comes in Strong After ‘The Voice’

nup_178708_1241-embed

TV Ratings: 'Ellen's Game of Games' Comes in Strong After 'The Voice'

The game show, airing a special preview before moving to Tuesdays on Jan. 2, held 85 percent of its lead-in.

Maybe more reality is the way for NBC to go after The Voice.

Monday's preview of Ellen DeGeneres' Game of Games scored the time slot's best non-sports ratings (and best retention) in over a year, bowing with a 1.7 rating among adults 18-49 and 7.4 million viewers. It easily topped the night's other 10 o'clock offerings and shed only 15 percent of its lead-in. (The Voice powered toward its finale with an average 2.0 rating in the key demo and 10.9 million viewers.)

Game of Games, a primetime spin on the daytime host's many on-air activities, officially premieres Jan. 2. Its freshman season will run on Tuesdays.

NBC's competition for the night was relatively modest. CBS offered up new episodes of its usual Monday block — Kevin Can Wait (1.1 adults), Man With a Plan (0.9 adults), Superior Donuts (0.8 adults), 9JKL (0.7 adults) and Scorpion (0.8 adults). On ABC, back-to-back episodes of The Great Christmas Light Fight each earned a 1.0 rating in the key demo before a year in review special got a 0.9 rating.

The CW aired specials, which gave the network a modest 0.1 rating among adults 18-49 in primetime.

TV Ratings
Read the full article – Hollywoodreporter.com